Landmark Supreme Court Judgments of 2024: Key Legal Precedents

The year 2024 has already proven to be a milestone for the Indian legal system, with several Landmark Supreme Court Judgments of 2024 marking significant shifts in constitutional law, civil rights, and legal precedents. These decisions represent some of the key legal precedents set by the Supreme Court in 2024, shaping the future of Indian jurisprudence. From constitutional rulings by the Supreme Court in 2024 to major judicial decisions by the Supreme Court in 2024, these 2024 landmark cases in Indian judiciary are set to influence legal practice and interpretation for years to come. Whether examining important Supreme Court rulings in 2024 or analyzing high-profile 2024 Supreme Court cases, this blog takes a closer look at how 2024 Supreme Court verdicts shaping law reflect the evolving nature of India’s legal landscape. Join us as we explore these notable 2024 Supreme Court decisions and their profound impact on the Indian legal system in 2024, driving legal transformations through Supreme Court judgments that will leave a lasting legacy.

---

1. In Re: Alleged Rape and Murder Incident of a Trainee Doctor in Kolkata (2024)

Issue: Need for institutional safety measures for medical professionals following a tragic incident at R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata.

A horrific incident involving the murder and alleged rape of a postgraduate doctor during her shift in a Kolkata hospital led to national outrage. This case highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare professionals, especially women, and the absence of adequate safety measures in medical institutions.

Judgment: The Supreme Court responded swiftly by setting up a National Task Force to develop and implement a national protocol for the safety and well-being of medical professionals. The court underscored the importance of ensuring secure working environments, with a particular focus on preventing gender-based violence. The Court also ordered an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the incident and directed the West Bengal government to submit reports on acts of vandalism that followed the incident.

Impact: This judgment is a significant step toward improving the working conditions and safety of healthcare professionals across the country. By forming a National Task Force, the Court emphasized the need for institutional reforms that prioritize the safety and dignity of medical staff, particularly women.

---

2. Kuldeep Kumar vs U.T. Chandigarh (2024)

Issue: Electoral malpractice in the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation mayoral elections.

This case involved a disputed mayoral election in Chandigarh, where the Presiding Officer declared eight votes invalid, affecting the result. The petitioner, Kuldeep Kumar, argued that these votes were wrongly declared invalid, allowing his opponent to win.

Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Kuldeep Kumar after examining the video footage of the vote counting. It found that the eight votes had been wrongly disqualified and that the Presiding Officer had made a false statement regarding the defacement of ballots. The Court declared Kuldeep Kumar the duly elected Mayor of Chandigarh and ordered proceedings against the Presiding Officer under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for making false statements.

Impact: This judgment underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to electoral fairness and transparency. It sends a strong message that electoral malpractice will not be tolerated, reinforcing the integrity of democratic processes at the municipal level.

---

3. Navas @ Mulanavas vs State of Kerala (2024)

Issue: Determining the appropriate term of imprisonment for murder.

In this criminal case, the appellant, Navas @ Mulanavas, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed the sentence, seeking leniency in his punishment.

Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the life sentence, ruling that the severity of the crime warranted the maximum punishment. The Court emphasized that murder is one of the gravest offenses, and judicial discretion in sentencing must balance individual circumstances with societal interests, particularly in cases involving the loss of human life.

Impact: This ruling reinforces the gravity of murder as a crime and the importance of maintaining strict penalties to deter violent crimes. The Court’s decision serves as a reminder of the need for proportional sentencing in cases involving serious offenses.

---

4. Mohanlal vs State of Madhya Pradesh (2024)

Issue: Applicability of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in cases of false accusations.

Mohanlal, the appellant, was convicted under the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing a substantial quantity of contraband. The appellant claimed that he had been falsely implicated and that the prosecution failed to follow the due process of law during the investigation and trial.

Judgment: The Supreme Court, while upholding the NDPS Act’s stringent provisions, acquitted Mohanlal on grounds of procedural irregularities. The Court ruled that non-compliance with the procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, particularly relating to search and seizure, rendered the conviction unsustainable.

Impact: This judgment reinforces the importance of adhering to legal safeguards, even under special laws like the NDPS Act. It sends a strong message to law enforcement agencies that procedural violations cannot be overlooked, as they compromise the fairness of a trial and the integrity of the legal process.

---

5. Re: Alleged Inaction of Authorities in Curbing Air Pollution in Delhi-NCR (2024)

Issue: Whether the government’s inaction in controlling air pollution in Delhi-NCR violates constitutional rights.

This public interest litigation (PIL) focused on the persistent air pollution crisis in Delhi-NCR. Petitioners sought judicial intervention, arguing that the government’s failure to mitigate air pollution amounted to a violation of the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Judgment: The Supreme Court took a stern view of the authorities’ failure to control air pollution and directed the Central and State governments to take immediate remedial measures. These included stricter enforcement of existing laws, reducing vehicular and industrial emissions, and imposing heavy penalties on non-compliant industries.

Impact: This judgment is a strong reminder of the government’s responsibility to ensure environmental protection and public health. The ruling underscores the judiciary’s active role in addressing environmental concerns, particularly when state agencies fall short in enforcing policies aimed at safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights.

---

Conclusion

The Landmark Supreme Court Judgments of 2024 serve as key turning points in the evolution of India’s legal and constitutional framework. These decisions have not only solidified important legal precedents but have also provided clarity on pressing issues facing the nation. From notable 2024 Supreme Court decisions to major judicial decisions by the Supreme Court in 2024, the Court’s rulings are shaping the trajectory of India’s legal landscape. As we look ahead, the Supreme Court’s impact on the Indian legal system in 2024 will undoubtedly continue to guide legal practitioners, policymakers, and citizens alike. The 2024 Supreme Court verdicts shaping law highlight the dynamic role of the judiciary in responding to societal change and ensuring justice. By analyzing these important Supreme Court rulings in 2024, we gain valuable insight into the future of Indian law and the enduring legacy of its highest court.

Related Posts-

1. Landmark Supreme Court Judgments of 2024: A Deep Dive into Key Rulings- Part II
2. Landmark Supreme Court Judgments of India: Shaping the Nation’s Legal Landscape
3. Why Landmark Judgments of the Supreme Court Are Crucial for Indian Society

---

Frequently Asked Questions