Read 4 minutes

As the apex court of India, the Supreme Court continues to deliver judgments that significantly impact both the legal system and society at large. In 2024, several high-profile cases addressed critical issues ranging from environmental protection and electoral processes to the rights of indigenous communities. Below, we analyze five key rulings that shaped the legal landscape in the first half of 2024.

1. In Re: Alleged Rape and Murder Incident of a Trainee Doctor in Kolkata (2024)

Issue: Need for institutional safety measures for medical professionals following a tragic incident at R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata.

A horrific incident involving the murder and alleged rape of a postgraduate doctor during her shift in a Kolkata hospital led to national outrage. This case highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare professionals, especially women, and the absence of adequate safety measures in medical institutions.

Judgment: The Supreme Court responded swiftly by setting up a National Task Force to develop and implement a national protocol for the safety and well-being of medical professionals. The court underscored the importance of ensuring secure working environments, with a particular focus on preventing gender-based violence. The Court also ordered an investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the incident and directed the West Bengal government to submit reports on acts of vandalism that followed the incident.

Impact: This judgment is a significant step toward improving the working conditions and safety of healthcare professionals across the country. By forming a National Task Force, the Court emphasized the need for institutional reforms that prioritize the safety and dignity of medical staff, particularly women.

2. Kuldeep Kumar vs U.T. Chandigarh (2024)

Issue: Electoral malpractice in the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation mayoral elections.

This case involved a disputed mayoral election in Chandigarh, where the Presiding Officer declared eight votes invalid, affecting the result. The petitioner, Kuldeep Kumar, argued that these votes were wrongly declared invalid, allowing his opponent to win.

Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Kuldeep Kumar after examining the video footage of the vote counting. It found that the eight votes had been wrongly disqualified and that the Presiding Officer had made a false statement regarding the defacement of ballots. The Court declared Kuldeep Kumar the duly elected Mayor of Chandigarh and ordered proceedings against the Presiding Officer under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for making false statements.

Impact: This judgment underscores the Supreme Court’s commitment to electoral fairness and transparency. It sends a strong message that electoral malpractice will not be tolerated, reinforcing the integrity of democratic processes at the municipal level.

3. Navas @ Mulanavas vs State of Kerala (2024)

Issue: Determining the appropriate term of imprisonment for murder.

In this criminal case, the appellant, Navas @ Mulanavas, was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed the sentence, seeking leniency in his punishment.

Judgment: The Supreme Court upheld the life sentence, ruling that the severity of the crime warranted the maximum punishment. The Court emphasized that murder is one of the gravest offenses, and judicial discretion in sentencing must balance individual circumstances with societal interests, particularly in cases involving the loss of human life.

Impact: This ruling reinforces the gravity of murder as a crime and the importance of maintaining strict penalties to deter violent crimes. The Court’s decision serves as a reminder of the need for proportional sentencing in cases involving serious offenses.

4. Mohanlal vs State of Madhya Pradesh (2024)

Issue: Applicability of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act in cases of false accusations.

Mohanlal, the appellant, was convicted under the NDPS Act for allegedly possessing a substantial quantity of contraband. The appellant claimed that he had been falsely implicated and that the prosecution failed to follow the due process of law during the investigation and trial.

Judgment: The Supreme Court, while upholding the NDPS Act’s stringent provisions, acquitted Mohanlal on grounds of procedural irregularities. The Court ruled that non-compliance with the procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act, particularly relating to search and seizure, rendered the conviction unsustainable.

Impact: This judgment reinforces the importance of adhering to legal safeguards, even under special laws like the NDPS Act. It sends a strong message to law enforcement agencies that procedural violations cannot be overlooked, as they compromise the fairness of a trial and the integrity of the legal process.

5. Re: Alleged Inaction of Authorities in Curbing Air Pollution in Delhi-NCR (2024)

Issue: Whether the government’s inaction in controlling air pollution in Delhi-NCR violates constitutional rights.

This public interest litigation (PIL) focused on the persistent air pollution crisis in Delhi-NCR. Petitioners sought judicial intervention, arguing that the government’s failure to mitigate air pollution amounted to a violation of the fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Judgment: The Supreme Court took a stern view of the authorities’ failure to control air pollution and directed the Central and State governments to take immediate remedial measures. These included stricter enforcement of existing laws, reducing vehicular and industrial emissions, and imposing heavy penalties on non-compliant industries.

Impact: This judgment is a strong reminder of the government’s responsibility to ensure environmental protection and public health. The ruling underscores the judiciary’s active role in addressing environmental concerns, particularly when state agencies fall short in enforcing policies aimed at safeguarding citizens’ fundamental rights.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s rulings in these five cases reflect its ongoing commitment to protecting democratic processes, ensuring workplace safety, and delivering justice in cases involving serious crimes. These judgments are crucial in reinforcing the rule of law and ensuring that the legal system evolves to address the pressing issues of the time.

From protecting healthcare professionals to maintaining the integrity of electoral processes and ensuring justice in criminal cases, the Supreme Court’s decisions in 2024 serve as a testament to its role in shaping Indian society and upholding the Constitution.

This blog highlights the Court’s decisive role in addressing issues that directly affect the lives of citizens, safeguarding justice, and ensuring transparency in governance.

Related Posts-