๐Ÿ“š Precedents in Action: How Past Judgments Shape Future Justice

Read 3 minutes

Imagine walking into a courtroom unsure of how your case will turn out.

Now imagine a world where the law follows a roadmap, where past decisions help guide present ones. Thatโ€™s exactly what judicial precedents do.

Whether you’re a law student, a judiciary aspirant, or just someone fascinated by how courts work, understanding judicial precedents is key to mastering legal reasoning.

Letโ€™s explore how precedent forms the foundation of justice systems in India and beyond, and why itโ€™s more than just following old rulings.


โš–๏ธ What Are Judicial Precedents?

In simple terms:

๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ A judicial precedent is a previous court decision used as a standard in subsequent cases with similar facts.

This concept is at the heart of common law systems like India and the UK. It ensures:

  • ๐Ÿ› Consistency
  • โš–๏ธ Fairness
  • ๐Ÿ” Predictability

The golden thread running through it all?

Stare Decisis โ€“ Latin for “to stand by things decided.”


๐Ÿงฉ The Two Sides of a Precedent

According to legal scholar Dias, a precedent includes:

Concrete Decision
โžค The final ruling applicable to the specific case.

Abstract Principle
โžค The broader rule derived from that ruling, which can be used in future cases.


๐Ÿง  Types of Precedents (Salmondโ€™s Classification)

๐Ÿ› Authoritative Precedents

  • Must be followed.
  • Come from higher courts.
  • Legally binding.

๐Ÿ’ก Persuasive Precedents

  • Not binding, but influential.
  • May include:
    • Foreign judgments (e.g., UK, US)
    • Dissenting opinions
    • Advisory rulings (like from the Privy Council)

๐Ÿ•ฐ Evolution of Precedents: From Custom to Case Law

๐Ÿ“œ Medieval England: Judges enforced customary practices
โš–๏ธ 18th Century: Lord Mansfield pushed for consistent legal application
๐Ÿ“˜ 19th Century: Lord Tenterden formalized the idea of binding precedent
๐Ÿ“– 20th Century: Holdsworth emphasized the balance between history and modernity

The takeaway?

Precedents arenโ€™t rigidโ€”theyโ€™re legal memory banks, evolving with time.


๐Ÿ› Court Hierarchies & Precedent Power

๐Ÿ“ In the UK:

  • House of Lords/Supreme Court โ†’ Binds all lower courts
  • Court of Appeal โ†’ Binds lower courts but can overrule itself in special cases
  • High Courts โ†’ Bind lower courts within jurisdiction
  • Divisional Courts โ†’ Have higher authority than single judges

In India:

Supreme Court โ†’ Its decisions bind all Indian courts

Can reverse its own rulings if necessary (via larger benches or constitutional review)

High Courts โ†’ Bind subordinate courts in the same state

Offer persuasive value to courts in other states

Subordinate Courts โ†’ Must follow High Court and Supreme Court rulings

๐Ÿ“Œ Article 141 of the Constitution:

โ€œThe law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts within the territory of India.โ€


๐Ÿง  Ratio Decidendi vs Obiter Dicta

๐Ÿงพ Ratio Decidendi

The core legal principle behind a decision
โœ… Binding in future cases

๐Ÿ’ฌ Obiter Dicta

Extra comments, observations, or side remarks
๐ŸŸก Not binding, but can be persuasive (especially if well-argued)


๐Ÿšซ Per Incuriam: When a Judgment Gets It Wrong

A decision is said to be per incuriam when it’s made:

  • Ignoring a relevant law or precedent
  • In error of jurisdiction or procedure

These are not binding and can be safely disregarded in future rulings.


๐Ÿ” Stare Decisis: Stability vs Flexibility

Stare decisis promotes:

  • ๐Ÿ” Legal certainty
  • ๐Ÿงญ Guidance for lower courts
  • โš–๏ธ Equal treatment

But itโ€™s not a cage. Courts can and do deviate when:

  • New social realities emerge
  • Past decisions are morally or legally flawed
  • Constitutional values demand innovation

๐Ÿ’ฅ The Power of Dissenting Opinions

Famous dissents have shaped history:

  • Justice H.R. Khannaโ€™s dissent in ADM Jabalpur laid the foundation for future rulings on personal liberty.
  • Justice Chandrachudโ€™s dissent in Sabarimala helped reframe the conversation on gender rights.

Dissent is a voice of legal foresightโ€”sometimes a whisper today becomes the rule tomorrow.


โš ๏ธ When Precedents Lose Power

A precedent may lose its force when:

๐Ÿ” Reversed by a higher court

โŒ Refused due to policy change

๐Ÿ” Distinguished due to different facts

๐Ÿ“˜ Ignored statute

๐Ÿค Sub Silentio (decided without addressing a crucial point)


๐Ÿงญ Why Precedents Matter (Especially for Judiciary Aspirants!)

They are not just dusty rulings from the pastโ€”they’re:

โœ… Exam goldmines (MCQs & mains) โœ… Answer-enhancers for case-based questions
โœ… Concept builders for applying law in practical scenarios

Knowing how and when a precedent binds a court can elevate your legal analysis.


๐ŸŽฏ Level-Up Your Judiciary Prep with Edzorb Law!

At Edzorb Law, we bring precedents to life with:

โšก๏ธ Flashcards on landmark cases

๐Ÿง  Visual notes on doctrines like Ratio, Obiter, Stare Decisis

๐Ÿ“ Mock test questions on judgment principles

๐Ÿ“ฑ Bite-sized lessons for anytime revision

Donโ€™t just memorizeโ€”master the art of precedent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Serial No.


Features


8 Months


11 Months


15 Months




Judgment Writing Course






Virtual Edzorb Study Space






Additional Cracsh Courses






Marks Enhancement Program






Coverage of Bare Act Revolution






Plan Validity




wpChatIcon
Home
Courses
Mocks
Past Papers
Daily Quiz